↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Completeness of HIV Surveillance Using Capture–Recapture Models, Alameda County, California

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the Completeness of HIV Surveillance Using Capture–Recapture Models, Alameda County, California
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1883-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Wesson, Richard Lechtenberg, Arthur Reingold, Willi McFarland, Neena Murgai

Abstract

HIV prevalence in Alameda County (including Oakland) is among the highest in California, yet the case registry may under-appreciate the full burden of disease. Using lists from health care facilities serving socioeconomically diverse populations and the HIV surveillance list, we applied capture-recapture methods to evaluate the completeness of the surveillance system by estimating the number of diagnosed people living with HIV and seeking care in Alameda County in 2013. Of the 5376 unique individuals reported from the lists, 397 were missing from the surveillance list. Models projected the total population size to be 5720 (95% CI 5587-6190), estimating the surveillance system as 87% complete. Subgroup analyses identified groups facing a disproportionate burden of HIV as more likely to be detected by the surveillance list. The Alameda County HIV surveillance system reports a high proportion of persons diagnosed with HIV within the jurisdiction. Capture-recapture analysis can help track progress towards maximizing engagement in HIV care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,906,966
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,227
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,845
of 319,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#44
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.