| Title |
RETRACTED: Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1400850111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 22% |
| Researcher | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 140 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2026.
All research outputs
#374,933
of 34,583,980 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,311
of 119,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,468
of 259,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#72
of 931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,583,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.