↓ Skip to main content

Positive patient experiences in an Australian integrative oncology centre

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Positive patient experiences in an Australian integrative oncology centre
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie J Furzer, Anna S Petterson, Kemi E Wright, Karen E Wallman, Timothy R Ackland, David JL Joske

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of cancer patients' utilising complementary and integrative therapies (CIT) within integrative oncology centres across Western Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Psychology 8 14%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,754
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,037
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,645
of 227,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#40
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.