Title |
Genetic diversity and classification of cyanobacteria in different Azolla species by the use of PCR fingerprinting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, November 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/s001220051323 |
Authors |
W. W. Zheng, M. Nilsson, B. Bergman, U. Rasmussen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,022,578
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,088
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,194
of 37,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.