| Title |
Assessing the utility of eDNA as a tool to survey reef-fish communities in the Red Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Coral Reefs, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00338-017-1618-1 |
| Authors |
Joseph D. DiBattista, Darren J. Coker, Tane H. Sinclair-Taylor, Michael Stat, Michael L. Berumen, Michael Bunce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 20% |
| Researcher | 37 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,085,868
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#879
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,013
of 322,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.