↓ Skip to main content

Carry-over effects from passage regions are more important than breeding climate in determining the breeding phenology and performance of three avian migrants of conservation concern

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Carry-over effects from passage regions are more important than breeding climate in determining the breeding phenology and performance of three avian migrants of conservation concern
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0731-5
Authors

Tom Finch, James W. Pearce-Higgins, D. I. Leech, Karl L. Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Student > Master 28 20%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Other 6 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 59%
Environmental Science 26 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,018,328
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#294
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,584
of 231,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.