↓ Skip to main content

Suicides in the Military: The Post-Modern Combat Veteran and the Hemingway Effect

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Suicides in the Military: The Post-Modern Combat Veteran and the Hemingway Effect
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11920-014-0460-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Andrew Castro, Sara Kintzle

Abstract

Suicides in the military have increased over the last ten years. Much effort has been focused on suicide prevention and treatment, as well as understanding the reasons for the sharp increase in military suicides. Despite this effort, the definitive causes of military suicides remain elusive. Further, highly effective suicide prevention and treatment approaches have not yet been developed. The purpose of this article is to present a short review of the current state of suicide prevention interventions within the context of the military. The root causes of suicidal behavior and the role of combat in the military are each discussed. Interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide and the military transition theory are introduced as guiding frameworks for understanding suicides and suicidal behavior amongst active military personnel and military veterans. The article concludes with a set of recommendations for moving forward in understanding and addressing suicides in the military.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 20 18%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 26%
Social Sciences 20 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,391,503
of 23,646,998 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#378
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,093
of 229,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,646,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.