↓ Skip to main content

Conflicting Evolutionary Histories of the Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genomes in New World Myotis Bats

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conflicting Evolutionary Histories of the Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genomes in New World Myotis Bats
Published in
Systematic Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syx070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy N Platt, Brant C Faircloth, Kevin AM Sullivan, Troy J Kieran, Travis C Glenn, Michael W Vandewege, Thomas E Lee, Robert J Baker, Richard D Stevens, David A Ray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 33 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 21%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,335,916
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#347
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,787
of 328,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.