↓ Skip to main content

Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation in Huambo and Luanda, Angola: A Qualitative Exploration of Motives

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation in Huambo and Luanda, Angola: A Qualitative Exploration of Motives
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10995-017-2349-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Qiu, Jhony Juarez, Adelaide de Carvalho, Frederico Joao Carlos Juliana, Lucas Nhamba, Isilda Neves, Vita Vemba, Ligia Alves, Abreu Pecamena, Peter Winch

Abstract

Introduction The Government of Angola is engaged in ongoing efforts to increase access to contraceptives, in particular contraceptive implants (CIs). Discontinuation of CIs, however, has been identified as being a challenge to this work, hindering the improvement of contraceptive prevalence, and in turn, maternal and child health. The objective of this study was to understand motives for contraceptive implant discontinuation in Luanda and Huambo, Angola. Methods We conducted 45 in-depth interviews and six focus groups amongst former and current contraceptive implant clients and family planning nurses in eight clinics across the provinces of Huambo and Luanda. Data collectors transcribed and translated key information from Portuguese into English. We used a combined deductive/inductive approach to code and analyze data. Results Participants described adverse side effects, desire for pregnancy, partner dissatisfaction, quality of care, alternative or lack of information, and religion as motives for discontinuation. Adverse side effects, including prolonged bleeding, amenorrhea, and headaches were most commonly cited by both clients and providers. Discussion Motives for discontinuation reflect existing findings from other studies in similar settings, in particular the influence of adverse side effects and desire for pregnancy as motivating factors. We contextualize these findings in the Angolan setting to tease out the relationship between cultural norms of ideal family size and the perceived role of women in regards to fertility and child-bearing. We suggest that programs enter into dialog with communities to address these concerns, rather than working exclusively on improving service delivery and quality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Librarian 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 30 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,851,263
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#1,144
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,024
of 319,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.