↓ Skip to main content

SPH Methods in the Modelling of Compact Objects

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
SPH Methods in the Modelling of Compact Objects
Published in
Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/lrca-2015-1
Authors

Stephan Rosswog

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 4%
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 65 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 38 51%
Engineering 15 20%
Mathematics 4 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,973,569
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics
#7
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,676
of 285,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them