↓ Skip to main content

Adverse outcomes of frailty in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Adverse outcomes of frailty in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10654-014-9924-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lies Lahousse, Bastiaan Maes, Gijsbertus Ziere, Daan W. Loth, Vincentius J. A. Verlinden, M. Carola Zillikens, André G. Uitterlinden, Fernando Rivadeneira, Henning Tiemeier, Oscar H. Franco, M. Arfan Ikram, Albert Hofman, Guy G. Brusselle, Bruno H. Stricker

Abstract

To investigate the prevalence of frailty in a Dutch elderly population and to identify adverse health outcomes associated with the frailty phenotype independent of the comorbidities. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses within the Rotterdam Study (the Netherlands), a prospective population-based cohort study in persons aged ≥55 years. Frailty was defined as meeting three or more of five established criteria for frailty, evaluating nutritional status, physical activity, mobility, grip strength and exhaustion. Intermediate frailty was defined as meeting one or two frailty criteria. Comorbidities were objectively measured. Health outcomes were assessed by means of questionnaires, physical examinations and continuous follow-up through general practitioners and municipal health authorities for mortality. Of 2,833 participants (median age 74.0 years, inter quartile range 9) with sufficiently evaluated frailty criteria, 163 (5.8 %) participants were frail and 1,454 (51.3 %) intermediate frail. Frail elderly were more likely to be older and female, to have an impaired quality of life and to have fallen or to have been hospitalized. 108 (72.0 %) frail participants had ≥2 comorbidities, compared to 777 (54.4 %) intermediate frail and 522 (44.8 %) non-frail participants. Adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities, frail elderly had a significantly increased risk of dying within 3 years (HR 3.4; 95 % CI 1.9-6.4), compared to the non-frail elderly. This study in a general Dutch population of community-dwelling elderly able to perform the frailty tests, demonstrates that frailty is common and that frail elderly are at increased risk of death independent of comorbidities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,820
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,547
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,528
of 228,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#31
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.