↓ Skip to main content

SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Stefanidis, Robert D. Fanelli, Ray Price, William Richardson, SAGES Guidelines Committee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,116,946
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,594
of 6,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,289
of 229,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#46
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.