↓ Skip to main content

Curcumin for the treatment of major depression: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Affective Disorders, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
87 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
33 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
6 Redditors
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Curcumin for the treatment of major depression: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study
Published in
Journal of Affective Disorders, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian L. Lopresti, Michael Maes, Garth L. Maker, Sean D. Hood, Peter D. Drummond

Abstract

Curcumin, the principal curcuminoid derived from the spice turmeric, influences several biological mechanisms associated with major depression, namely those associated with monoaminergic activity, immune-inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity and neuroprogression. We hypothesised that curcumin would be effective for the treatment of depressive symptoms in individuals with major depressive disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 350 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 88 25%
Student > Master 40 11%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Other 20 6%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 91 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 8%
Psychology 22 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 6%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 105 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#209,538
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#120
of 10,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,618
of 244,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#2
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.