| Title |
Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Qualitative Sociology, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:quas.0000049239.15922.a3 |
| Authors |
Kevin D. Haggerty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 2% |
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 95 | 22% |
| Unknown | 63 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 183 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 35 | 8% |
| Psychology | 25 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 22 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 86 | 20% |
| Unknown | 74 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#995,084
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Sociology
#21
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,829
of 151,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them