↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Automated Classification and Digitization Approaches to Detect Change in Eelgrass Bed Extent During Restoration of a Large River Delta

Overview of attention for article published in Northwest Science, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Automated Classification and Digitization Approaches to Detect Change in Eelgrass Bed Extent During Restoration of a Large River Delta
Published in
Northwest Science, August 2017
DOI 10.3955/046.091.0307
Authors

Anna E. Davenport, Jerry D. Davis, Isa Woo, Eric E. Grossman, Jesse Barham, Christopher S. Ellings, John Y. Takekawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Northwest Science
#110
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,074
of 317,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Northwest Science
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.