↓ Skip to main content

Smoking practices in New York City: The use of a population-based survey to guide policy-making and programming

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Smoking practices in New York City: The use of a population-based survey to guide policy-making and programming
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, February 2005
DOI 10.1093/jurban/jti008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farzad Mostashari, Bonnie D. Kerker, Anjum Hajat, Nancy Miller, Thomas R. Frieden

Abstract

To inform New York City's (NYC's) tobacco control program, we identified the neighborhoods with the highest smoking rates, estimated the burden of second-hand smoke exposure, assessed the early response to state taxation, and examined cessation practices. We used a stratified random design to conduct a digit-dialed telephone survey in 2002 among 9,674 New York City adults. Our main outcome measures included prevalence of cigarette smoking, exposure to second-hand smoke, the response of smokers to state tax increases, and cessation practices. Even after controlling for sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, income, education, marital status, employment status, and foreign-born status) smoking rates were highest in Central Harlem and in the South Bronx. Sixteen percent of nonsmokers reported frequent exposure to second-hand smoke at home or in a workplace. Among smokers with a child with asthma, only 33% reported having a no-smoking policy in their homes. More than one fifth of smokers reported reducing the number of cigarettes they smoked in response to the state tax increase. Of current smokers who tried to quit, 65% used no cessation aid. These data were used to inform New York City's smoke-free legislation, taxation, public education, and a free nicotine patch give-away program. In conclusion, large, local surveys can provide essential data to effectively advocate for, plan, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive tobacco control program.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,638,246
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#336
of 1,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,366
of 60,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.