You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A common Greenlandic TBC1D4 variant confers muscle insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida Moltke, Niels Grarup, Marit E. Jørgensen, Peter Bjerregaard, Jonas T. Treebak, Matteo Fumagalli, Thorfinn S. Korneliussen, Marianne A. Andersen, Thomas S. Nielsen, Nikolaj T. Krarup, Anette P. Gjesing, Juleen R. Zierath, Allan Linneberg, Xueli Wu, Guangqing Sun, Xin Jin, Jumana Al-Aama, Jun Wang, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Oluf Pedersen, Rasmus Nielsen, Anders Albrechtsen, Torben Hansen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 12% |
| Denmark | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 57% |
| Scientists | 59 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 398 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 97 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 65 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 81 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#199,984
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,895
of 98,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,517
of 243,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#134
of 1,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.