↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for postpartum depression: the role of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for postpartum depression: the role of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R)
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00737-009-0071-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Oppo, M. Mauri, D. Ramacciotti, V. Camilleri, S. Banti, C. Borri, C. Rambelli, M. S. Montagnani, S. Cortopassi, A. Bettini, S. Ricciardulli, S. Montaresi, P. Rucci, C. T. Beck, G. B. Cassano

Abstract

The aims of this study were to identify the frequency of the risk factors for postpartum depression (PPD) listed in the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R) during pregnancy and 1 month after delivery and to determine the predictive validity of the PDPI-R. The study used a prospective cohort design. Women completed the PDPI-R at the 3rd and the 8th months of pregnancy and at the 1st month after childbirth. Women were prospectively followed across three different time points during the postpartum using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders to determine the presence of major or minor depression. The prenatal version of the PDPI-R administered at two different time points during pregnancy predicted accurately 72.6% and 78.2% of PPD and the full version administered at the 1st month after delivery predicted 83.4% of PPD. The cutoffs identified were 3.5 for the prenatal version and 5.5 for the full version. The PDPI-R is a useful and a valid screening tool for PPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#19,017,658
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#830
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,562
of 94,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.