↓ Skip to main content

Reversible cardiac dysfunction associated with hypocalcemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Reversible cardiac dysfunction associated with hypocalcemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10741-013-9371-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darrell B. Newman, Salman S. Fidahussein, Deanne T. Kashiwagi, Kurt A. Kennel, Kianoush B. Kashani, Zhen Wang, Osama Altayar, Mohammad H. Murad

Abstract

Case reports have documented reversible cardiac dysfunction in the setting of severely depressed extracellular calcium concentrations. The present systematic review and meta-analyses of individual patient data were conducted to further characterize the cardiac dysfunction associated with low serum calcium levels in the clinical setting. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed databases and the Cochrane Library and the Registry of Clinical Trials from 1948 through August 2011. Studies that evaluated low serum calcium and cardiac dysfunction were identified and included for review. A total of 43 studies comprised of 47 individual cases met inclusion criteria. Univariate linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between corrected QT interval (QTc) length and corrected total serum calcium level (B = -23.19, SE = 8.04, P = 0.01), left ventricular ejection fraction and corrected total serum calcium (B = 5.16, SE = 1.29, P < 0.01) and ionized serum calcium (B = 5.48, SE = 2.04, P = 0.03). Hypocalcemia may be associated with reversible cardiac dysfunction including QTc interval prolongation and depressed left ventricular systolic function. The available evidence is very limited and does not provide a rationale for a certain threshold or a recommendation for calcium replacement. Future research is needed in this important and common metabolic disorder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,820
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#605
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,276
of 281,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.