↓ Skip to main content

Printable Heterostructured Bioelectronic Interfaces with Enhanced Electrode Reaction Kinetics by Intermicroparticle Network

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Printable Heterostructured Bioelectronic Interfaces with Enhanced Electrode Reaction Kinetics by Intermicroparticle Network
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2017
DOI 10.1021/acsami.7b12559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodtichoti Wannapob, Mikhail Yu Vagin, Yu Liu, Panote Thavarungkul, Proespichaya Kanatharana, Anthony P. F. Turner, Cheung Mak

Abstract

Printable organic bioelectronics provide a fast and cost-effective approach for the fabrication of novel biodevices, while the general challenge is to achieve optimized reaction kinetic at multiphase boundaries between biomolecules and electrodes. Here, we present an entirely new concept based on a modular approach for the construction of hetero-structured bioelectronic interfaces by using tailored functional "biological microparticles" combined with "transducer microparticles" as modular building blocks. This approach offers high versatility for the design and fabrication of bioelectrodes with variety forms of inter-particle spatial organisations, from layered-structures to more advance bulk hetero-structured architectures. The hetero-structured biocatalytic electrodes delivered twice the reaction rate and a six-fold increase in the effective diffusion kinetics in response to a catalytic model using glucose as the substrate, together with the advantage of shortened diffusion paths for reactants between multiple inter-particle junctions and large active particle surface. The consequent benefits of this improved performance combined with the simple means of mass production are of major significance for the emerging printed electronics industry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 3 25%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Chemistry 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#11,937
of 17,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,650
of 316,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#277
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.