↓ Skip to main content

Third-space fluid distribution of pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Third-space fluid distribution of pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer patients
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00280-014-2485-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Hartvig Honoré, Sigrid Jóhansdóttir Joensen, Michelle Olsen, Steen Honoré Hansen, Anders Mellemgaard

Abstract

Hydrophilic drugs particularly those with low plasma protein binding may accumulate in third-space fluid in the body. Cytotoxic drugs like methotrexate (MTX) cause damage in the tissue, and evacuation of the third-space fluid in pleura is strongly recommended before new dosing. Pemetrexed (PEM) is a multi-targeted antifolate similar to MTX approved for the treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. Current recommendations for patients receiving treatment with PEM prescribe draining of the pleural fluid. This is based upon the recommendations for MTX and not directly to any specific findings relating to PEM. The recommendations are the same because PEM is an analogue of MTX; the molecular structures and pharmacokinetic parameters are similar. However, since draining the pleural fluid is painful and cancer patient are particularly susceptible to infection subsequently, it is relevant to examine the recommendations for PEM explicitly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,937,115
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#93
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,433
of 229,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.