Title |
The association between labour variables and primiparous women’s experience of childbirth; a prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-208 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hanna Ulfsdottir, Eva Nissen, Elsa-Lena Ryding, Doris Lund-Egloff, Eva Wiberg-Itzel |
Abstract |
Studies have suggested several risk factors for a negative birth experience among primiparas. Factors that are mentioned frequently include labour dystocia, operative intervention such as acute caesarean section or vacuum extraction, or the infant being transferred to neonatal care. Another important factor mentioned is lack of support from the midwife. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
France | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 26% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,439,925
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,368
of 4,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,755
of 228,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#36
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.