↓ Skip to main content

Imaging of body packing: errors and medico-legal issues

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Imaging of body packing: errors and medico-legal issues
Published in
Abdominal Radiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00261-015-0469-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfonso Reginelli, Anna Russo, Fabrizio Urraro, Duilia Maresca, Ciro Martiniello, Alfredo D’Andrea, Luca Brunese, Antonio Pinto

Abstract

Body packing is the ingestion or insertion in the human body of packed illicit substances. Over the last 20 years, drug smuggling has increased global and new means of transport of narcotics have emerged. Among these, the most frequent one is the gastrointestinal tract: from mouth to anus, vagina, and ears. Cocaine is one of the most traded drugs, followed by heroin. Condoms, latex gloves, and balloons are typically used as drug packets for retention in the body. There are different radiologic modalities to detect illicit drugs in body packing: Plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and magnetic resonance. Current protocols recommend the use of radiography to confirm packet retention and, in case of doubt, the use of abdominal CT scan with reduced mAs. In case of packet rupture, catastrophic effects can occur. Management of patients carrying packets of drugs is a recurrent medico-legal problem. To improve diagnostic accuracy and prevent hazardous complications, radiologists and emergency physicians should be familiar with radiologic features of body packing. The radiologist plays both a social and a medico-legal role in their assessment, and it should not be limited only to the identification of the packages but must also provide accurate information about their number and their exact location. In this review, we focus on diagnostic errors and medico-legal issues related to the radiological assessment of body packers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%