| Title |
Tracking of Cell Nuclei for Assessment of In Vitro Uptake Kinetics in Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery Using Fibered Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Imaging and Biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11307-014-0726-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Derieppe, Baudouin Denis de Senneville, Hugo Kuijf, Chrit Moonen, Clemens Bos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#93
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,773
of 234,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.