↓ Skip to main content

Inhomogeneity simplified

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal C, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Inhomogeneity simplified
Published in
The European Physical Journal C, December 2014
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3176-9
Authors

Marika Taylor, William Woodhead

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 20%
Spain 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#5,231
of 9,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,942
of 367,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#58
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,055 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.