↓ Skip to main content

Active rotational and translational microrheology beyond the linear spring regime

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active rotational and translational microrheology beyond the linear spring regime
Published in
Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, April 2017
DOI 10.1103/physreve.95.042608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lachlan J Gibson, Shu Zhang, Alexander B Stilgoe, Timo A Nieminen, Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop

Abstract

Active particle tracking microrheometers have the potential to perform accurate broadband measurements of viscoelasticity within microscopic systems. Generally, their largest possible precision is limited by Brownian motion and low frequency changes to the system. The signal to noise ratio is usually improved by increasing the size of the driven motion compared to the Brownian as well as averaging over repeated measurements. New theory is presented here whereby error in measurements of the complex shear modulus can be significantly reduced by analyzing the motion of a spherical particle driven by nonlinear forces. In some scenarios error can be further reduced by applying a variable transformation which linearizes the equation of motion. This enables normalization that eliminates error introduced by low frequency drift in the particle's equilibrium position. Our measurements indicate that this can further resolve an additional decade of viscoelasticity at high frequencies. Using this method will easily increase the signal strength enough to significantly reduce the measurement time for the same error. Thus the method is more conducive to measuring viscoelasticity in slowly changing microscopic systems, such as a living cell.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 62%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#9,123
of 20,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,568
of 323,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#132
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.