↓ Skip to main content

Ballistic Exercise as a Pre-Activation Stimulus: A Review of the Literature and Practical Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
Title
Ballistic Exercise as a Pre-Activation Stimulus: A Review of the Literature and Practical Applications
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0214-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean J. Maloney, Anthony N. Turner, Iain M. Fletcher

Abstract

Post-activation potentiation (PAP) refers to the acute enhancement of muscular function as a direct result of its contractile history. Protocols designed to elicit PAP have commonly employed heavy resistance exercise (HRE) as the pre-activation stimulus; however, a growing body of research suggests that low-load ballistic exercises (BE) may also provide an effective stimulus. The ability to elicit PAP without the need for heavy equipment would make it easier to utilise prior to competition. It is hypothesised that BE can induce PAP given the high recruitment of type II muscle fibres associated with its performance. The literature has reported augmentations in power performance typically ranging from 2 to 5 %. The performance effects of BE are modulated by loading, recovery and physical characteristics. Jumps performed with an additional loading, such as depth jumps or weighted jumps, appear to be the most effective activities for inducing PAP. Whilst the impact of recovery duration on subsequent performance requires further research, durations of 1-6 min have been prescribed successfully in multiple instances. The effect of strength and sex on the PAP response to BE is not yet clear. Direct comparisons of BE and HRE, to date, suggest a tendency for HRE protocols to be more effective; future research should consider that these strategies must be optimised in different ways. The role of acute augmentations in lower limb stiffness is proposed as an additional mechanism that may further explain the PAP response following BE. In summary, BE demonstrates the potential to enhance performance in power tasks such as jumps and sprints. This review provides the reader with some practical recommendations for the application of BE as a pre-activation stimulus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 289 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 21%
Student > Bachelor 46 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Researcher 16 5%
Other 13 4%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 71 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 160 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 75 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,120,454
of 24,157,645 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#952
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,274
of 232,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,157,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.