| Title |
The New Data Quality Task Group (DQTG): ensuring high quality data today and in the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metabolomics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11306-014-0679-1 |
| Authors |
Daniel W. Bearden, Richard D. Beger, David Broadhurst, Warwick Dunn, Arthur Edison, Claude Guillou, Robert Trengove, Mark Viant, Ian Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 60% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,839,883
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#585
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,303
of 228,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.