↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic Dissection of Bone Mineral Density Reveals Skeletal Site Specificity and Facilitates the Identification of Novel Loci in the Genetic Regulation of Bone Mass Attainment

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic Dissection of Bone Mineral Density Reveals Skeletal Site Specificity and Facilitates the Identification of Novel Loci in the Genetic Regulation of Bone Mass Attainment
Published in
PLoS Genetics, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004423
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. Kemp, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Karol Estrada, Beate St Pourcain, Denise H. M. Heppe, Nicole M. Warrington, Ling Oei, Susan M. Ring, Claudia J. Kruithof, Nicholas J. Timpson, Lisa E. Wolber, Sjur Reppe, Kaare Gautvik, Elin Grundberg, Bing Ge, Bram van der Eerden, Jeroen van de Peppel, Matthew A. Hibbs, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Kwangbom Choi, Daniel L. Koller, Michael J. Econs, Frances M. K. Williams, Tatiana Foroud, M. Carola Zillikens, Claes Ohlsson, Albert Hofman, André G. Uitterlinden, George Davey Smith, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Jonathan H. Tobias, Fernando Rivadeneira, David M. Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#6,866
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,167
of 246,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#127
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.