↓ Skip to main content

Tubulointerstitial nephritis as adverse effect of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, nivolumab, showed distinct histological findings

Overview of attention for article published in CEN Case Reports, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 255)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Tubulointerstitial nephritis as adverse effect of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, nivolumab, showed distinct histological findings
Published in
CEN Case Reports, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13730-017-0269-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ai Uchida, Maho Watanabe, Aya Nawata, Yosuke Ikari, Masaru Sasaki, Kana Shigemoto, Satoshi Hisano, Hitoshi Nakashima

Abstract

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) blocks T cell inhibition and stimulate immunologic response toward cancer cells. It was also revealed that PD-1/PD-L1 interaction crucially controls the effector differentiation of auto-reactive T cells to maintain self-tolerance. Therefore, potential autoimmunological side-effect can occur in any organ. Here, we report a case of 67-year-old Japanese male with lung adenocarcinoma treated with nivolumab who developed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis after the third infusion of nivolumab. Kidney biopsy showed distinct histological findings: Proliferation of CD38 positive and IgG positive plasma cells, and affluent infiltration of FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells. Herein, we do pathological discussion concerning acute tubulointerstitial nephritis occurred in this case based on these histological findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 60%
Computer Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from CEN Case Reports
#42
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,575
of 317,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CEN Case Reports
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.