↓ Skip to main content

Treating sleeve gastrectomy leak with endoscopic stenting: the kuwaiti experience and review of recent literature

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Treating sleeve gastrectomy leak with endoscopic stenting: the kuwaiti experience and review of recent literature
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3616-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Waleed Alazmi, Salman Al-Sabah, Daliya AlMohammad Ali, Sulaiman Almazeedi

Abstract

Obesity today is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, and bariatric surgeries such as laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are increasingly playing a key role in its management. Such operations, however, carry many difficult and sometimes fatal complications, including leaks. This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic stenting in treating gastric leaks post-LSG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,785
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,818
of 228,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#91
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.