↓ Skip to main content

Why Machine-Information Metaphors are Bad for Science and Science Education

Overview of attention for article published in Science & Education, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Why Machine-Information Metaphors are Bad for Science and Science Education
Published in
Science & Education, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11191-010-9267-6
Authors

Massimo Pigliucci, Maarten Boudry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 26 29%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 24%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Philosophy 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,923,654
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Science & Education
#68
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,767
of 95,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them