↓ Skip to main content

Polyphasic taxonomic revision of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: proposal to emend the descriptions of Ralstonia solanacearum and Ralstonia syzygii and reclassify current R. syzygii…

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
336 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polyphasic taxonomic revision of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: proposal to emend the descriptions of Ralstonia solanacearum and Ralstonia syzygii and reclassify current R. syzygii strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. syzygii subsp. nov., R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis subsp. nov., banana blood disease bacterium strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis subsp. nov. and R. solanacearum phylotype I and III strains as Ralstoniapseudosolanacearum sp. nov.
Published in
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.066712-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irda Safni, Ilse Cleenwerck, Paul De Vos, Mark Fegan, Lindsay Sly, Ulrike Kappler

Abstract

The Ralstonia solanacearum species complex has long been recognized as a group of phenotypically diverse strains that can be subdivided into four phylotypes. Using a polyphasic taxonomic approach on an extensive set of strains, this study provides evidence for a taxonomic and nomenclatural revision of members of this complex. Data obtained from phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer (ITS) region sequences, partial endoglucanase (egl) gene sequences and DNA-DNA hybridizations demonstrate that the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex is comprised of three genospecies. One of these includes the type strain of R. solanacearum and consists of R. solanacearum phylotype II strains only. The second genospecies includes the type strain of R. syzygii and contains only phylotype IV strains. This genospecies is subdivided into three distinct groups, namely R. syzygii, the causal agent of Sumatra disease on clove trees in Indonesia, R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains isolated from different host plants mostly from Indonesia, and strains of the blood disease bacterium (BDB), the causal agent of the Banana Blood Disease, a bacterial wilt disease in Indonesia affecting bananas and plantains. The last genospecies is composed of R. solanacearum strains belonging to phylotypes I and III. As these genospecies are also supported by phenotypic data that allow the differentiation of the three genospecies, the following taxonomic proposals are made: emendation of the descriptions of R. solanacearum and R. syzygii, descriptions of Ralstonia syzygii subsp. syzygii (R 001T = LMG 10661T = DSM 7385T) for the current R. syzygii strains, Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis subsp. nov. (UQRS 464T = LMG 27703T = DSM 27478T) for the current R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains, Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis subsp. nov. (UQRS 627T = LMG 27706T = DSM 27477T) for the BDB strains and Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum sp. nov. (UQRS 461T = LMG 9673T = NCPPB 1029T) for the R. solanacearum phylotype I and III strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 87 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 87 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,047,954
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#3,044
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,161
of 242,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#11
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.