↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Outcomes with Medications for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
28 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Outcomes with Medications for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Published in
CNS Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11589380-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Shu Huang, Ming-Horng Tsai

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a common neurobehavioural disorder characterized by inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity, is a chronic disorder and often persists into adulthood. CNS stimulants have been the most well known treatment for ADHD for several decades due to their high effectiveness, good safety profiles and relatively minor adverse effects. Non-stimulant agents, including atomoxetine, extended-release guanfacine and extended-release clonidine (US FDA approved), and several non-FDA-approved agents, such as bupropion and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), were recently proven to be effective alternatives to the stimulants in several open-label and placebo-controlled trials. However, most medication trials for ADHD have been short term and thus have not provided information on the long-term outcomes of ADHD treatment. Since the medical treatment of many children with ADHD, especially those with more severe symptoms or co-morbid disorders, has to be continued for several years, recent studies have shifted their focus from the acute effectiveness of stimulants or non-stimulant drugs to the long-term outcomes of medications for ADHD. Evidence has shown that stimulants, along with the non-stimulants atomoxetine and extended-release guanfacine, are continuously effective for 24-month treatment periods with few and tolerable adverse effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Psychology 30 20%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 28 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,390,932
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#98
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,230
of 187,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#34
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.