↓ Skip to main content

A study on the physical fitness index, heart rate and blood pressure in different phases of lunar month on male human subjects

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
A study on the physical fitness index, heart rate and blood pressure in different phases of lunar month on male human subjects
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00484-012-0605-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ujjwal Chakraborty, Tusharkanti Ghosh

Abstract

The gravitational pull of the moon on the earth is not the same in all phases of the lunar month, i.e. new moon (NM), first quarter (FQ), full moon (FM) and third quarter (TQ), and as a result the amplitude of tide differs in different phases. The gravitational pull of the moon may have effects on the fluid compartments of the human body and hence the cardiovascular system may be affected differentially in the different phases of the lunar month. In the present study resting heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), physical fitness index (PFI), peak HR and BP immediately after step test, and recovery HR and BP after step test were measured during different phases of the lunar month in 76 male university students (age 23.7 ± 1.7 years). At rest, both systolic and mean arterial BP were ∼5 mmHg lower in NM and FM compared to FQ and TQ, but resting HR was not significantly different between phases. Further, peak HR and peak systolic BP after step test were lower (∼4 beat/min and ∼5 mmHg, respectively) in NM and FM compared to FQ and TQ. PFI was also higher (∼5) in NM and FM compared to FQ and TQ. Recovery of HR after step test was quicker in NM and FM compared to that of FQ and TQ. It appears from this study that gravitational pull of the moon may affect the cardiovascular functions of the human body. Moreover, the physical efficiency of humans is increased in NM and FM due to these altered cardiovascular regulations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Computer Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#722,117
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#51
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,661
of 182,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.