↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of rituximab as maintenance therapy for relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis—a case series

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of rituximab as maintenance therapy for relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis—a case series
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10067-013-2351-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Knight, H. Hallenberg, E. Baecklund

Abstract

The objective of this work was to study the efficacy and safety of pre-emptive rituximab (RTX) in a series of patients with severe relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). GPA is a systemic vasculitis with a high relapse rate despite successful remission induction. Drug toxicity with repeated induction treatments and long-standing immunosuppression poses a problem. Based on the findings in reports on RTX for rheumatoid arthritis, we treated patients with severe relapsing GPA with pre-emptive RTX, 1,000 mg 2 weeks apart every 6 months, aiming at achieving sustainable remission. All patients at one centre with relapsing GPA in spite of traditional maintenance treatment, who had received more than or equal to three cycles of RTX as regularly repeated pre-emptive maintenance therapy every 6 months, were included in this retrospective study. Information on disease manifestations and activity, treatments, lab parameters and adverse events was extracted from the medical files. Of the 12 included patients, all with a positive proteinase 3-anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, generalised disease and a median disease duration of 35 months (21-270), 92 % (11/12) achieved sustainable remission during a median follow-up time of 32 months (range 21-111) from first RTX treatment. Concomitant immunosuppressants were reduced. Infections were the most common adverse events, but infections were an issue also before the start of RTX. RTX administered every 6 months seems to be an effective maintenance treatment in a population with severe, relapsing long-standing GPA. Granulomatous as well as vasculitic manifestations responded equally well. Infections are a problem in this patient group but no new safety problems were identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,667,264
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,184
of 3,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,371
of 204,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.