↓ Skip to main content

Breastfeeding Versus Formula-Feeding and Girls’ Pubertal Development

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breastfeeding Versus Formula-Feeding and Girls’ Pubertal Development
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10995-014-1533-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aarti Kale, Julianna Deardorff, Maureen Lahiff, Cecile Laurent, Louise C. Greenspan, Robert A. Hiatt, Gayle Windham, Maida P. Galvez, Frank M. Biro, Susan M. Pinney, Susan L. Teitelbaum, Mary S. Wolff, Janice Barlow, Anousheh Mirabedi, Molly Lasater, Lawrence H. Kushi

Abstract

To examine the association of breastfeeding or its duration with timing of girls' pubertal onset, and the role of BMI as a mediator in these associations. A population of 1,237 socio-economically and ethnically diverse girls, ages 6-8 years, was recruited across three geographic locations (New York City, Cincinnati, and the San Francisco Bay Area) in a prospective study of predictors of pubertal maturation. Breastfeeding practices were assessed using self-administered questionnaire/interview with the primary caregiver. Girls were seen on at least annual basis to assess breast and pubic hair development. The association of breastfeeding with pubertal timing was estimated using parametric survival analysis while adjusting for body mass index, ethnicity, birth-weight, mother's education, mother's menarcheal age, and family income. Compared to formula fed girls, those who were mixed-fed or predominantly breastfed showed later onset of breast development [hazard ratios 0.90 (95 % CI 0.75, 1.09) and 0.74 (95 % CI 0.59, 0.94), respectively]. Duration of breastfeeding was also directly associated with age at onset of breast development (p trend = 0.008). Associations between breastfeeding and pubic hair onset were not significant. In stratified analysis, the association of breastfeeding and later breast onset was seen in Cincinnati girls only. The association between breast feeding and pubertal onset varied by study site. More research is needed about the environments within which breastfeeding takes place in order to better understand whether infant feeding practices are a potentially modifiable risk factor that may influence age at onset of breast development and subsequent risk for disease in adulthood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 18%
Psychology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,019,854
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#73
of 2,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,593
of 244,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.