| Title |
Grafting with rootstocks induces extensive transcriptional re-programming in the shoot apical meristem of grapevine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-13-147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Jane Cookson, Nathalie Ollat |
| Abstract |
Grafting is widely used in the agriculture of fruit-bearing crops; rootstocks are known to confer differences in scion biomass in addition to improving other traits of agricultural interest. However, little is known about the effect of rootstocks on scion gene expression. The objective of this study was to determine whether hetero-grafting the grapevine variety Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon N' with two different rootstocks alters gene expression in the shoot apex in comparison to the auto-grafted control. Cabernet Sauvignon was hetero-grafted with two commercial rootstock genotypes and auto-grafted with itself. Vigor was quantified by measurements of root, stem, leaf and trunk biomass. Gene expression profiling was done using a whole genome grapevine microarray; four pools of five shoot apex samples were harvested 4 months after grafting for each scion/rootstock combination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 29% |
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,417
of 3,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,417
of 220,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.