↓ Skip to main content

The RNA modification landscape in human disease

Overview of attention for article published in RNA, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 3,142)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
427 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The RNA modification landscape in human disease
Published in
RNA, August 2017
DOI 10.1261/rna.063503.117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicky Jonkhout, Julia Tran, Martin A. Smith, Nicole Schonrock, John S. Mattick, Eva Maria Novoa

Abstract

RNA modifications have been historically considered as fine-tuning chemo-structural features of infrastructural RNAs, such as rRNAs, tRNAs and snoRNAs. This view has changed dramatically in the recent years, to a large extent as a result of systematic efforts to map and quantify various RNA modifications in a transcriptome-wide manner, revealing that RNA modifications are reversible, dynamically regulated, far more widespread than originally thought, and involved in major biological processes, including cell differentiation, sex determination and stress responses. Here we summarize the state of knowledge and provide a catalogue of RNA modifications and their links to neurological disorders, cancers and other diseases. With the advent of direct RNA sequencing technologies, we expect that this catalogue will help prioritize those RNA modifications for transcriptome-wide maps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 502 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 18%
Researcher 59 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 12%
Student > Master 56 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 160 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 189 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 12%
Chemistry 22 4%
Computer Science 11 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 2%
Other 40 8%
Unknown 171 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#743,078
of 24,709,170 outputs
Outputs from RNA
#12
of 3,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,673
of 320,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RNA
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,709,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.