| Title |
Evolution of Cranial Shape in Caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11692-014-9287-2 |
| Authors |
Emma Sherratt, David J. Gower, Christian Peter Klingenberg, Mark Wilkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Researcher | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 61% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,440,785
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#24
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,951
of 243,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.