↓ Skip to main content

Do Historical Changes in Parent–Child Relationships Explain Increases in Youth Conduct Problems?

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do Historical Changes in Parent–Child Relationships Explain Increases in Youth Conduct Problems?
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10802-011-9543-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Collishaw, Frances Gardner, Barbara Maughan, Jacqueline Scott, Andrew Pickles

Abstract

The coincidence of historical trends in youth antisocial behavior and change in family demographics has led to speculation of a causal link, possibly mediated by declining quality of parenting and parent-child relationships. No study to date has directly assessed whether and how parenting and parent-child relationships have changed. Two national samples of English adolescents aged 16-17 years in 1986 (N = 4,524 adolescents, 7,120 parents) and 2006 (N = 716 adolescents, 734 parents) were compared using identical questionnaire assessments. Youth-reported parental monitoring, expectations, and parent-child quality time increased between 1986 and 2006. Ratings of parental interest did not change. Parenting differences between affluent and disadvantaged families narrowed over time. There was thus little evidence of a decline in quality of parenting for the population as a whole or for disadvantaged subgroups. Parent-reported youth conduct problems showed a modest increase between 1986 and 2006. Findings suggested that the increase in youth conduct problems was largely unrelated to observed change in parent-child relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 31%
Social Sciences 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,158,255
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#90
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,765
of 130,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.