| Title |
Practice nurse involvement in primary care depression management: an observational cost-effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodi Gray, Hossein Haji Ali Afzali, Justin Beilby, Christine Holton, David Banham, Jonathan Karnon |
| Abstract |
Most evidence on the effect of collaborative care for depression is derived in the selective environment of randomised controlled trials. In collaborative care, practice nurses may act as case managers. The Primary Care Services Improvement Project (PCSIP) aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative models of practice nurse involvement in a real world Australian setting. Previous analyses have demonstrated the value of high level practice nurse involvement in the management of diabetes and obesity. This paper reports on their value in the management of depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Psychology | 14 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,954
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,064
of 321,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#40
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.