↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Vitamin D in the Prevention of Myocardial Injury Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Vitamin D in the Prevention of Myocardial Injury Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/jcph.989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naser Aslanabadi, Iraj Jafaripor, Selda Sadeghi, Hadi Hamishehkar, Samad Ghaffari, Mehdi Toluey, Hanieh Azizi, Taher Entezari‐Maleki

Abstract

Myocardial injury following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occurs in about one-third of patients and is associated with mortality. Platelet aggregation, thrombosis formation, and inflammation are the main causes of cardiac injury during PCI. Vitamin D plays a key role in the cardiovascular system by exerting antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and anti-inflammatory properties. There is no published study that investigated the effect of vitamin D in the prevention of cardiac injury following elective PCI. In a randomized clinical trial, 99 patients admitted for elective PCI were randomized into vitamin D (n = 52) and control (n = 47) groups. The intervention group received 300 000 IU vitamin D orally 12 hours before PCI. The cardiac biomarkers were checked at baseline, 8 and 24 hours after PCI. hs-CRP was also measured at baseline and after 24 hours. The increase in CK-MB was documented in 20 patients (42%) in the control group and 18 patients (34.6%) in the intervention group (P = .417). Furthermore, the increase in cTnI occurred in 4 patients (8%) and 2 patients (3.3%) in the control and intervention groups, respectively (P = .419). No significant changes were noted in the level of cardiac biomarkers. In the vitamin D group, the mean difference in CK-MB between 8 and 24 hours was significantly lower (P = .048). The mean difference in hs-CRP was significantly lower in the vitamin D group (P = .045). This study could not show a clear effect of vitamin D in the prevention of cardiac injury during elective PCI. Further outcome-based studies are needed to describe the role of vitamin D in the prevention of periprocedural myocardial injury..

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,577,773
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#250
of 2,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,546
of 320,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.