↓ Skip to main content

Rational design and validation of a Tip60 histone acetyltransferase inhibitor

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rational design and validation of a Tip60 histone acetyltransferase inhibitor
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep05372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunxia Gao, Emer Bourke, Martin Scobie, Melina Arcos Famme, Tobias Koolmeister, Thomas Helleday, Leif A. Eriksson, Noel F. Lowndes, James A. L. Brown

Abstract

Histone acetylation is required for many aspects of gene regulation, genome maintenance and metabolism and dysfunctional acetylation is implicated in numerous diseases, including cancer. Acetylation is regulated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases and currently, few general HAT inhibitors have been described. We identified the HAT Tip60 as an excellent candidate for targeted drug development, as Tip60 is a key mediator of the DNA damage response and transcriptional co-activator. Our modeling of Tip60 indicated that the active binding pocket possesses opposite charges at each end, with the positive charges attributed to two specific side chains. We used structure based drug design to develop a novel Tip60 inhibitor, TH1834, to fit this specific pocket. We demonstrate that TH1834 significantly inhibits Tip60 activity in vitro and treating cells with TH1834 results in apoptosis and increased unrepaired DNA damage (following ionizing radiation treatment) in breast cancer but not control cell lines. Furthermore, TH1834 did not affect the activity of related HAT MOF, as indicated by H4K16Ac, demonstrating specificity. The modeling and validation of the small molecule inhibitor TH1834 represents a first step towards developing additional specific, targeted inhibitors of Tip60 that may lead to further improvements in the treatment of breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Chemistry 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#92,819
of 122,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,115
of 228,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#636
of 863 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 863 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.