↓ Skip to main content

New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: when a robotic hand becomes one’s own

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: when a robotic hand becomes one’s own
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, June 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13428-014-0498-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie A. Caspar, Albert De Beir, Pedro A. Magalhaes De Saldanha Da Gama, Florence Yernaux, Axel Cleeremans, Bram Vanderborght

Abstract

The rubber hand illusion is an experimental paradigm in which participants consider a fake hand to be part of their body. This paradigm has been used in many domains of psychology (i.e., research on pain, body ownership, agency) and is of clinical importance. The classic rubber hand paradigm nevertheless suffers from limitations, such as the absence of active motion or the reliance on approximate measurements, which makes strict experimental conditions difficult to obtain. Here, we report on the development of a novel technology-a robotic, user- and computer-controllable hand-that addresses many of the limitations associated with the classic rubber hand paradigm. Because participants can actively control the robotic hand, the device affords higher realism and authenticity. Our robotic hand has a comparatively low cost and opens up novel and innovative methods. In order to validate the robotic hand, we have carried out three experiments. The first two studies were based on previous research using the rubber hand, while the third was specific to the robotic hand. We measured both sense of agency and ownership. Overall, results show that participants experienced a "robotic hand illusion" in the baseline conditions. Furthermore, we also replicated previous results about agency and ownership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 32%
Engineering 18 14%
Neuroscience 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,602,536
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#433
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,359
of 243,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.