↓ Skip to main content

Choroidal thickness in relation to sex, age, refractive error, and axial length in healthy Turkish subjects

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Choroidal thickness in relation to sex, age, refractive error, and axial length in healthy Turkish subjects
Published in
International Ophthalmology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10792-014-9962-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibrahim Tuncer, Eyyup Karahan, Mehmet Ozgur Zengin, Eray Atalay, Nihat Polat

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between choroidal thickness (CT) and sex, age, refractive error (RE), and axial length in healthy subjects. This is a study of 154 eyes in 154 healthy subjects. CT measurements were performed by the same experienced technician using a spectral domain optical coherence tomography device. CT was measured perpendicularly from the outer edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid-sclera boundary at the fovea and at six more points which are located at, respectively, 500 µm nasal to the fovea, 1,000 µm nasal to the fovea, and 1,500 μm nasal to the fovea, 500 μm temporal to the fovea, 1,000 μm temporal to the fovea, and 1,500 μm temporal to the fovea. The RE was measured by autorefractometry, and the axial length was measured by interferometry. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate CT at each location, and to the correlations of CT with sex, age, RE, and axial length. The mean subfoveal CT was 265.86 ± 60.32 µm, the mean age was 49.01 ± 19.19 years, the mean RE was -0.17 ± 1.20 diopters (D), and the mean axial length was 23.39 ± 0.76 mm. CT profile indicated that the choroid was thicker at the fovea than at temporal and nasal locations. Univariable linear regression analysis showed that subfoveal CT decreased 3.14 µm for each year of age and decreased 79.33 µm for each mm of axial length (P = 0.000, R (2) = 0.249; P = 0.000, R (2) = 0.487, respectively). In a similar analysis, subfoveal CT was found to decrease by 50.24 µm/D myopia-shifted change in refraction (P = 0.000, R (2) = 0.201). The subfoveal choroid was 99.16 µm (39.22 %) thicker in men than women when adjusting for age and axial length (P = 0.000, R (2) = 0.249). CT decreases with increasing myopia, age, and axial length. Men had thicker choroid than women, and CT varies depending on location.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,722,431
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#483
of 1,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,880
of 228,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.