You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Five Strategies to Effectively Use Online Resources in Emergency Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Emergency Medicine, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.05.029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brent Thoma, Nikita Joshi, N. Seth Trueger, Teresa M. Chan, Michelle Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 369 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 98 | 27% |
| Canada | 45 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 9% |
| Australia | 18 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 6 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Unknown | 122 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 189 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 121 | 33% |
| Scientists | 43 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 29% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#121,703
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#60
of 6,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#905
of 243,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.