You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Birth Weight and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2008.886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter H. Whincup, Samantha J. Kaye, Christopher G. Owen, Rachel Huxley, Derek G. Cook, Sonoko Anazawa, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Santosh K. Bhargava, Bryndís E. Birgisdottir, Sofia Carlsson, Susanne R. de Rooij, Roland F. Dyck, Johan G. Eriksson, Bonita Falkner, Caroline Fall, Tom Forsén, Valdemar Grill, Vilmundur Gudnason, Sonia Hulman, Elina Hyppönen, Mona Jeffreys, Debbie A. Lawlor, David A. Leon, Junichi Minami, Gita Mishra, Clive Osmond, Chris Power, Janet W. Rich-Edwards, Tessa J. Roseboom, Harshpal Singh Sachdev, Holly Syddall, Inga Thorsdottir, Mauno Vanhala, Michael Wadsworth, Donald E. Yarbrough |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 422 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 16% |
| Researcher | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 177 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 98 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,702,068
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#11,522
of 36,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,831
of 187,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#37
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.