↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics of the Inhaled Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator AZD5423 Following Inhalation Using Different Devices

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics of the Inhaled Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator AZD5423 Following Inhalation Using Different Devices
Published in
The AAPS Journal, March 2017
DOI 10.1208/s12248-016-0042-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Melin, Susanne Prothon, Charlotte Kloft, Adriaan Cleton, Carl Amilon, Carin Jorup, Per Bäckman, Bo Olsson, Ulrika Wählby Hamrén

Abstract

AZD5423 is a non-steroidal glucocorticoid receptor modulator, with low aqueous solubility, developed for treatment of asthma and COPD. In this work, we aim to evaluate and compare the absorption pharmacokinetics (PK) of AZD5423 after inhalation via four devices, (Spira®, I-neb®, Turbuhaler® and a new dry powder inhaler (new DPI)) with two formulations using differently sized primary particles, and to compare the pulmonary bioavailability with the predicted lung deposited dose. Plasma concentration-time data after intravenous, oral and inhaled administration via four devices were available from two clinical studies in healthy and asthmatic subjects. A population PK modelling approach was taken to sequentially incorporate each route of administration, assuming parallel absorption compartments for inhaled AZD5423. A non-compartmental analysis for derivation of PK parameters was performed for comparison. Pulmonary bioavailability varied between devices, with the lowest estimates for I-neb (27%) and Turbuhaler (30%) and the highest for the new DPI (46%) and Spira (35-49%). The pulmonary bioavailability was substantially lower than the predicted lung deposited dose (range 59-90%). Lung absorption was separated into a faster and a slower process in the model. The half-life of the faster absorption appeared formulation-dependent, while the slower absorption (half-life of 0.59-0.78 h) appeared independent of formulation. The large difference in the estimated pulmonary bioavailability and the predicted lung deposited dose for AZD5423 implies an impact of mucociliary clearance. The lung absorption half-life indicates that AZD5423 is retained in the lung for a relatively short time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Other 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#13,493,320
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#695
of 1,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,559
of 307,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.