| Title |
HPV genotypes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a multiethnic cohort in the southeastern USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-014-0406-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriana C. Vidal, Jennifer S. Smith, Fidel Valea, Rex Bentley, Maggie Gradison, Kimberly S. H. Yarnall, Anne Ford, Francine Overcash, Kathy Grant, Susan K. Murphy, Cathrine Hoyo |
| Abstract |
For poorly understood reasons, invasive cervical cancer (ICC) incidence and mortality rates are higher in women of African descent. Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes distribution may vary between European American (EA) and African-American (AA) women and may contribute to differences in ICC incidence. The current study aimed at disentangling differences in HPV distribution among AA and EA women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 630 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 162 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 3% |
| Canada | 12 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | <1% |
| South Africa | 6 | <1% |
| Comoros | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 49 | 8% |
| Unknown | 354 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 603 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
| Scientists | 7 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 483. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#56,336
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#4
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375
of 243,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.